<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ross and Brand: fame versus privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/</link>
	<description>A blog about design, gaming and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Satire is dead&#8212;just ask ITV Revert to Saved: Candid commentary on games, DVDs, music and technology by Craig Grannell</title>
		<link>http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Satire is dead&#8212;just ask ITV Revert to Saved: Candid commentary on games, DVDs, music and technology by Craig Grannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reverttosaved.com/?p=129#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] I recently moaned about the unbelievably stupid, over-the-top public reaction to Brand and Ross&#8217;s telephone prank, where tens of thousands of people who hadn&#8217;t witnessed the incident nonetheless complained, which has led to the powers-that-be saying we need a register of &#8216;high risk&#8217; programmes. Whether this means killing something like Brass Eye (or even Mock the Week) at birth remains to be seen&#8212;probably, as we enter another Mary Whitehouse era. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently moaned about the unbelievably stupid, over-the-top public reaction to Brand and Ross&#8217;s telephone prank, where tens of thousands of people who hadn&#8217;t witnessed the incident nonetheless complained, which has led to the powers-that-be saying we need a register of &#8216;high risk&#8217; programmes. Whether this means killing something like Brass Eye (or even Mock the Week) at birth remains to be seen&#8212;probably, as we enter another Mary Whitehouse era. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Jones</title>
		<link>http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reverttosaved.com/?p=129#comment-367</guid>
		<description>You know, I read the transcript of the 4 calls made to Saches answer machine. It was pretty over the top actually. But all it needed was an apology. The 30,000 complaints is just absurd. It&#039;s no different to the droves of Americans who were discussed by Janet Jackson&#039;s left nipple which they hadn&#039;t seen on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I read the transcript of the 4 calls made to Saches answer machine. It was pretty over the top actually. But all it needed was an apology. The 30,000 complaints is just absurd. It&#8217;s no different to the droves of Americans who were discussed by Janet Jackson&#8217;s left nipple which they hadn&#8217;t seen on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Parker</title>
		<link>http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reverttosaved.com/?p=129#comment-366</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ve seen far, far worse on television and heard far, far worse on radio&quot; - exactly - the BBC have shown people being buried alive on prime time TV (on Eastenders) and nobody gives a damn, but somebody carries out a schoolboy prank on a late night radio show (not defending what they did, just trying to illustrate the scale of the crime) and it&#039;s the biggest scandal of the year. Just utterly unbelievable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ve seen far, far worse on television and heard far, far worse on radio&#8221; &#8211; exactly &#8211; the BBC have shown people being buried alive on prime time TV (on Eastenders) and nobody gives a damn, but somebody carries out a schoolboy prank on a late night radio show (not defending what they did, just trying to illustrate the scale of the crime) and it&#8217;s the biggest scandal of the year. Just utterly unbelievable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Grannell</title>
		<link>http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Grannell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reverttosaved.com/?p=129#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Like I said, I&#039;m not defending Ross or Brand on this one. What they did was childish, immature and insulting. Thing is, I&#039;ve seen far, far worse on television and heard far, far worse on radio. This incident seems to be a lot of fuss about very little.

As for Baillie, any sympathy I had for her vanished when she took her story to the Sun. She wasn&#039;t &#039;asking for it&#039; before, but she is now. If you really want privacy, don&#039;t get Max Clifford involved and go bleating to interviewers in a British red-top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, I&#8217;m not defending Ross or Brand on this one. What they did was childish, immature and insulting. Thing is, I&#8217;ve seen far, far worse on television and heard far, far worse on radio. This incident seems to be a lot of fuss about very little.</p>
<p>As for Baillie, any sympathy I had for her vanished when she took her story to the Sun. She wasn&#8217;t &#8216;asking for it&#8217; before, but she is now. If you really want privacy, don&#8217;t get Max Clifford involved and go bleating to interviewers in a British red-top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediumRob</title>
		<link>http://reverttosaved.com/2008/10/31/ross-and-brand-fame-versus-privac/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>MediumRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reverttosaved.com/?p=129#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I do think it&#039;s all a bit pointless, although you could argue that what they did was technically a crime. It was just a couple of messages on an answerphone - it&#039;s not like they firebombed his house.

Although I normally steer clear of the &quot;they had a perfect right to do it and I&#039;ll defend what they did to the hilt, but I personally didn&#039;t find it funny&quot; argument used by people who want to sit on both sides of the fence, I&#039;ve never found phone pranks funny, so I&#039;ve unfortunately ended up in that particularly crowd this time. 

However, I do think the &quot;she was asking for it&quot; argument isn&#039;t a camp that I&#039;d ever like to find myself in, no matter what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think it&#8217;s all a bit pointless, although you could argue that what they did was technically a crime. It was just a couple of messages on an answerphone &#8211; it&#8217;s not like they firebombed his house.</p>
<p>Although I normally steer clear of the &#8220;they had a perfect right to do it and I&#8217;ll defend what they did to the hilt, but I personally didn&#8217;t find it funny&#8221; argument used by people who want to sit on both sides of the fence, I&#8217;ve never found phone pranks funny, so I&#8217;ve unfortunately ended up in that particularly crowd this time. </p>
<p>However, I do think the &#8220;she was asking for it&#8221; argument isn&#8217;t a camp that I&#8217;d ever like to find myself in, no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

