Review: The Dark Knight (Batman)
Dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner
I like to go into films blind. That way, I’m more likely to have an experience that will surprise and enthral. With The Dark Knight, this wasn’t possible. Not only was the Joker’s presence all but guaranteed during the ending to Batman Begins, but Heath Ledger’s death has elevated his performance in many people’s minds to the status of some kind of acting god. The net result is that the hype machine has been on overdrive, with pretty much everyone calling this the Best Comic Film Ever.
I disagree. That’s not to say it isn’t good, nor that it’s not worth watching. However, I sat there only mildly entertained by the plot and slightly disturbed by the brutality (in excess of most comic-book movies, and certainly over-the-top for a 12A film, but you’ll have seen a lot worse elsewhere). What lifts the film above merely average is some impressive stunt-work, one or two decent twists, and Ledger’s engaging Joker, who seems to be channelling a little Jack Nicholson and quite a lot of Michael Keaton throughout.
What almost drags the film down again is, well, almost everything else. Like Batman Begins, this movie is somehow hollow and lacks soul. And seemingly content to cherry-pick the best bits from various Batman comics (Alan Moore’s The Killing Joke, Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns, etc.), thereby offering an almost Batman-by-committee result, the film lacks focus. Perhaps it tries to tie too many threads together, but the result is convoluted and feels rushed, despite its extended viewing time.
The onus is largely on the escalation of warfare between Gotham’s most famous vigilante and the enemies around him—in other words, if it wasn’t for Batman, these super-villains wouldn’t exist. This has been an ongoing theme in Batman for some years now, although I’m pretty sure we didn’t need the Joker rather clumsily spelling this point out to Batman at one point during the movie.
And so although we get a standout (if not Oscar-worthy) performance from Ledger, some crunching battles, a few great scenes (notably a fast-paced bank heist that’s at once wicked and funny, but also almost anything Two Face does during his limited screen time) and a film that hammers home the ‘dark’ in ‘Dark Knight’ (repeatedly), we also have a somewhat self-important and gloomy production that’s at least a half-hour too long.
Once again, the Joker lost during the first round of Celebrity Poker Showdown.
Have to agree about the film being a set-piece too long, and too dark (for the 12A), but it was better than most of the crap I’ve seen this year. Gets four out of five from me. And I hope Ledger does get the best supporting actor gong, because he deserved it for Brokeback Mountain (so on the totting-up system that the Oscars judges seem to employ, he’s a clear winner) 😉
Being an Aussie you would think that I would be totally biased when it comes to Heath Ledger. I live in perth where Heath grew up. Heath is all around me here. Ididnt care when he dies and couldnt see what all the fuss was about. Didn’t see brokeback and I’m not going to. But I watched this film and was absolutey captivated with Heath’s Joker. So much fun! Amazing performance and I recomend this film just to see the best joker we have seen on any screen yet. RIP Heath and long live the joker! Awsome!