Reuters reports on NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker saying it won’t offer 99-cent TV-show rentals on iTunes, mirroring Warner.

Zucker:

We do not think 99 cents is the right price point for our content. … We thought it would devalue our content.

Yes, I’m sure that’s your real concern, Zucker. It’s nothing to do with thinking that you’ll get the same amount of sales at the $1.99 price-point, which is frankly a bit of a rip-off, or that you’d ideally like to keep people buying overpriced DVDs rather than move to digital rentals. However, the likelihood is studios will gross more with low-priced rentals, and consumers will see such shows as good value for money, not ‘devalued’. (Again, see WoSBlog’s investigation into Pac-Man for iOS pricing for the reality of what happens when high-profile meets high-value in iTunes.)

I sincerely hope those who have signed up for 99-cent rentals—Fox, ABC, Disney Channel and BBC America—start making money hand over fist, at the expense of NBC and Warner. And, believe me, it pains me to say “I hope Fox makes even more money than it does now,” but something needs to give studios a reality check regarding TV rental pricing.

Android 2.2, Froyo is slowly being rolled out, but ‘Gingerbread’, scheduled for a Q4 launch, will OBLITERATE Apple and iOS, according to half the tech industry. This is because, in their heads, Steve Jobs has decided to jack in his role as a visionary and become a gardener. Consequently, while he will remain as Apple CEO, the company will not move forward from this point on, allowing even Nokia to eventually speed past.

Alternatively, tech industry hacks, bear in mind that Apple develops stuff too. I’m sure Gingerbread will better Froyo, but I’m equally sure iOS 4.3 or 5.x will better iOS 4.2 (coming in November) and iOS 4.1. Making comparisons about something that doesn’t even exist in the wild versus something released this month—especially in such a fast-moving industry—is stupid, so stop doing it.

If you’re an American, you can rent TV shows on the new Apple TV. Companies like Warner have bitched about low revenues, but they’ll change their tune when Fox and ABC start making money hand-over-fist. It’s also been shown that Apple TV runs iOS (Wired), the same operating system that powers the iPad, iPhone and iPod touch. However, since it has little on-board storage, it’s unlikely you’ll be stuffing if full of iOS apps and games any time soon, according to just about everyone.

The thing is, Apple TV isn’t about stuffing it full of anything. The idea is to stream content or rent. To that end, I wonder whether Apple will provide games for the system, but using some kind of rental model. Shove Game Center into the mix and you wouldn’t lose your scores, so you could download Soopah Arcade Funk for a buck, play it until your brain melts, then return to it via another rental a few months later and continue where you left off.

So The Guadian’s waded in with its size-tens, running an op-ed by Charles Arthur about Jobs being all grumpy with a trainee journo. She complains that Apple PR hasn’t responded to her questions (welcome to my world, baby journo!), and there’s a brief to-and-fro before Jobs says “Please leave us alone”.

I write for a bunch of Mac magazines, and am regularly frustrated with Apple PR. Those I deal with are friendly, courteous people, and they help when it benefits Apple very directly (they’re quick to supply review software, for example), but that’s basically it. The thing is, everyone in this industry knows the score with Apple, apart, apparently, from this trainee.

She says:

Unfortunately, for a journalist in the professional world, lacking the answers they need on deadline day won’t just cost them a grade; it could cost them their job.

That’s pretty unlikely when it comes to Apple, unless you’re working for an editor that’s gone mental and actually expects you to get a comment from the company. Even if that’s the case, whining to the CEO won’t help matters, and, frankly, if you’re going to be a journo, you’ll need to figure out some other course of action when things don’t go your way. In her case, an article on “implementation of an iPad program” at her school, was Apple PR really the only source she could use? Did she really expect the PR arm of a huge multinational to be at her beck and call?

Arhoolie sums it up nicely in the Guardian article’s comments:

[…] the whine of “don’t you realise you are threatening my grade” is quite common. Perhaps if the students made sure the work they have chosen to pursue is practical first much of this grief could be avoided.

Commercial firms, charities, and Govt Departements [sic] are not in existence to be a training resource for student journalists.

Of late, I get asked quite a lot whether someone should buy an iPad or a Kindle. I’ve been struggling to come up with a really good analogy with other tech for these devices, and have usually gone down the ‘if you read a lot of books, get a Kindle, otherwise get an iPad’ route. This doesn’t always work well, because people then start rattling on about web access and games, and if I tell them to ‘go and get both devices then’, they yell “do you think I’m made of money?” before throwing spoons at me and storming off in a huff.

Over the weekend, it struck me that there’s a better, faster analogy out there: the Kindle is a television. Bear with me on this one.

The point here is that people still watch televisions, due to the user-experience. They have PCs, on which they can easily enough watch TV, but doing so is pretty hateful. Even if you’ve a shiny new 27″ iMac in your living room, it’s going to offer a worse TV experience than a far cheaper flatscreen TV, because the TV is designed for watching TV, and that’s something people do a lot of.

The Kindle is the same. People enjoy reading books on it, due to the user-experience. On a tablet PC, you can easily enough read a book, but doing so is pretty hateful. Even if you’ve a shiny new iPad in your living room, it’s going to offer a worse long-format reading experience than a far cheaper Kindle, because the Kindle is designed for reading books, and that’s something… well, that’s something some people do a lot of.

Of course, television manufacturers are rapidly trying to screw up my analogy by welding ‘apps’ to their flatscreens—the bastards; but I figure I’ve a few months left yet before I have to think of something else, other than walking about the place wearing a ‘Look, just buy whatever the fuck you want’ T-shirt.