Apple tries to contain its disappointment as disappointing iPhone 4S gets only a disappointing ONE MILLION pre-orders in disappointing first 24 hours

Yeah, that iPhone 4S. What a disappointment, eh? I guess the one million pre-orders in just 24 hours will be rapidly dismissed by idiots as being all made my idiots, with only the former idiots actually being proper idiots. Those idiots (the actual idiots, mind) will be crossing their idiot fingers, hoping desperately that Apple somehow manages to sell no more iPhones at all until the iPhone 5 comes out. The idiots.

Apple:

Apple® today announced pre-orders of its iPhone® 4S have topped one million in a single day, surpassing the previous single day pre-order record of 600,000 held by iPhone 4.

Translation: See? SEE? All you tech pundits that said we’d screwed up are dolts. SEE? This is why our PR people ignore you. Probably.

iPhone 4S is the most amazing iPhone yet, packed with incredible new features including Apple’s dual-core A5 chip for blazing fast performance and stunning graphics; an all new camera with advanced optics; full 1080p HD resolution video recording; and Siri™, an intelligent assistant that helps you get things done just by asking.

“Siri, how do we get tech pundits to think before they type?”

October 10, 2011. Read more in: Apple, News, Opinions, Technology

2 Comments

What Guy Kawasaki learned from Steve Jobs

Ex-Apple and now venture capitalist Guy Kawasaki writes for CNN: “What I learned from Steve Jobs“. There’s some great stuff in there, which should be required reading for anyone in product design, sales, marketing and even journalism.

If you ask customers what they want, they will tell you, “Better, faster, and cheaper”—that is, better sameness, not revolutionary change. They can describe their desires only in terms of what they are already using—around the time of the introduction of Macintosh, all that people said they wanted was a better, faster, and cheaper MS-DOS machine. The richest vein for tech startups is creating the product that you want to use—that’s what Steve and Woz did.

This is the one that almost no companies understand. They’re too scared to create something they really want to use, and they focus-test everything to death. But focus testing often results in safe decisions and mediocrity. You can see it in high-profile tech right now, with Metro being welded to Windows 8, rather than Microsoft making a braver move; but you see it everywhere in media, too, with most games, television shows and movies being tiny incremental steps, more or less copying what already exists.

Take a look at Steve’s slides. The font is 60 points. There’s usually one big screenshot or graphic. Look at other tech speaker’s slides—even the ones who have seen Steve in action. The font is 8 points, and there are no graphics. So many people say that Steve was the world’s greatest product introduction guy. Don’t you wonder why more people don’t copy his style?

This goes for more than just presentations: it’s about communication and clarity in a more general sense. Plenty of print and web design doesn’t follow this mantra—there’s a desire to try to get too much information over, which overwhelms the readers. Stick to what’s important and make it clear. If someone wants more detail, they can always ask you.

Changing your mind is a sign of intelligence. When Apple first shipped the iPhone there was no such thing as apps. Apps, Steve decreed, were a bad thing because you never know what they could be doing to your phone. Safari Web apps were the way to go until six months later when Steve decided, or someone convinced him, that apps were the way to go—but of course. Duh! Apple came a long way in a short time from Safari Web apps to “there’s an app for that.”

The problem with changing your mind is that too many people consider it a sign of weakness. This is most common in politics: politicians will run with the most bone-headed idea, because otherwise the press will be on at them for weeks about a “humiliating U-turn”. And the same sometimes happens in tech, too. The reality, as Kawasaki says, is that you can often think you’ve got it right, but experience states otherwise. I’d argue stronger people are willing to admit they got something wrong, not weaker ones. People who fix problems are strong; people who ignore them are idiots.

October 9, 2011. Read more in: Apple, News, Opinions

Comments Off on What Guy Kawasaki learned from Steve Jobs

Joe Wilcox argues Apple should have delayed the iPhone 4S out of respect for Steve Jobs

Did Google and Samsung do what Apple wouldn’t?“, asks Joe Wilcox. As you might have heard, Samsung/Google pulled the Nexus Prime announcement, arguing it was “just not the right time”. I wondered if other reasons were behind the delay, but the two companies later confirmed:

We believe this is not the right time to announce a new product as the world expresses tribute to Steve Jobs’s passing.

Of course, this might still be misdirection to deal with some other problem with the device, but anyway.

Wilcox argues, bizarrely, that Apple should have done the same thing with the iPhone 4S:

So what? Google and Samsung show respect for Jobs, but Apple doesn’t?

Apple announced iPhone 4S on October 4. A day later, the company revealed that Jobs, Apple’s chairman and until late-August its CEO, had died. The world is mourning the loss of one of the rarest of humans — a true visionary who compelled loyalty among the people closest to him and those who used Apple’s products, in part by aspiring for something better. How does Apple remember Jobs? By keeping business as usual.

News of Jobs death came late-day on October 5. My colleagues and I couldn’t really discuss it until the following day. When everyone was online in group chat I chimed: “Now comes the test of the new management’s character. I would delay iPhone 4S launch a week out of respect”.

If that’s really what Wilcox chimed, he doesn’t get Apple and he didn’t get Jobs. Steve Jobs was hugely proud of everything he achieved at Apple. The iPhone 4S is one of the last things that will have his direct involvement. Delaying its release and therefore potentially hampering its success, to mourn Jobs, would have not been respectful but an insult to the man. More to the point, Jobs remained involved with all things Apple right to the end. Does anyone really believe that Jobs himself wasn’t pushing the rest of the team to go ahead with the launch, regardless of his health?

[The] assertion that “business is business” is bunk. Google and Samsung show respect for Jobs’ passing in ways the Apple hasn’t — and should have. The new management has failed the test of character I put before my colleagues two days ago.

Absolute garbage. The best way to show respect for Jobs is to celebrate his life and to ensure the company he rebuilt continues to thrive. The way Apple can do that is by ensuring the latest thing he worked on is a success, and you don’t do that by shutting down.

Also, it’s hardly like Apple is entirely without heart. There can’t be too many companies that would remove everything from their website’s home page—including details about their shiny new product—in order to present a picture of their late visionary. But perhaps in his desire to bash Apple and its management team, Wilcox has failed to visit apple.com at any time since Steve Jobs died.

Apple home page

October 9, 2011. Read more in: Apple, Opinions, Technology

7 Comments

Stephen Fry on Steve Jobs on design

You probably already read Stephen Fry’s intelligent, thoughtful article on Steve Jobs. If not, go and do so now, because it’s very good. But the Macalope‘s column today reminded me that I wanted to briefly discuss a couple of points Fry makes that at least half the tech press simply doesn’t seem to understand, and yet that drove almost everything Jobs worked for: design is about how something works, not just how it looks. Good design encompasses everything, from form to (where relevant) technology to human impact.

Fry:

Only dullards crippled into cretinism by a fear of being thought pretentious could be so dumb as to believe that there is a distinction between design and use, between form and function, between style and substance. If the unprecedented and phenomenal success of Steve Jobs at Apple proves anything it is that those commentators and tech-bloggers and “experts” who sneered at him for producing sleek, shiny, well-designed products or who denigrated the man because he was not an inventor or originator of technology himself missed the point in such a fantastically stupid way that any employer would surely question the purpose of having such people on their payroll, writing for their magazines or indeed making any decisions on which lives, destinies or fortunes depended.

This is something I entirely agree with. The mistake people make is to assume not only what Fry mentions later, quoting a Jobs interview with Fortune magazine —

In most people’s vocabularies, design means veneer. It’s interior decorating. It’s the fabric of the curtains and the sofa.

— but also that this was all Apple and Jobs have ever been involved with.

It’s depressing that too often these days in technology, someone will talk about design in the negative. They will dismiss a well-designed product as an expensive trinket, or something unsuitable for anyone who doesn’t want a dumbed-down experience. They’ll suggest cheaper alternatives. But, really, good design improves everything: how something looks, how something works, how something interacts with you, how something can save you time or bring you joy.

The final words,I’ll leave to Jobs:

Design is the fundamental soul of a man-made creation that ends up expressing itself in successive outer layers of the product or service.

October 8, 2011. Read more in: Apple, Opinions, Technology

Comments Off on Stephen Fry on Steve Jobs on design

Samsung and Google pull Nexus Prime, and say it’s ‘just not the right time’

Odd article on TechRadar about Samsung and Google pulling the Nexus Prime product announcement:

Samsung and Google decide to postpone the new product announcement at CTIA Fall.

We agree that it is just not the right time to announce a new product. New date and venue will be shortly announced.

TechRadar leaps to the conclusion a lot of other sites have come to:

It’s likely that the companies decided to postpone as a mark of respect to rival Steve Jobs, who passed away earlier this week.

If so, that would be astonishing from a business standpoint, allowing a rival to steam forward, because an industry figurehead has passed away. Frankly, I don’t believe it for a second. Maybe I’m just a big ol’ cynic but I reckon if this really was the case for the delay, the joint statement would (and should) have said so. Instead, chances are that the delay is down to other reasons (technical, or just not wanting to get buried in the tech press, which, clearly, mostly has Steve Jobs on its mind right now), and the statement has been cunningly worded.

Ian Betteridge agrees:

Call me a cynic, but thats a vague enough statement to allow people to interpret it as Jobs-related, while meaning something else.

Hmm.

Update: All THings D now reports:

We believe this is not the right time to announce a new product as the world expresses tribute to Steve Jobs’s passing.

So, turns out I am a cynic, but this is also a lesson in communication for Google and Samsung: say what you mean and don’t be vague.

October 7, 2011. Read more in: Technology

1 Comment

« older postsnewer posts »