Tech journalism’s nadir: comparing Google Glass and Apple’s iWatch
Sometimes I feel the need to repeatedly refresh a browser, in the hope that what I’m reading is actually some kind of weird bug that’s coincidentally fashioned a bunch of words before my eyes into a festering pile of stupid. That’s pretty much what happened when I saw Google Glass vs. Apple iWatch: How Do They Compare?, written by Greg Roberts for ReadWrite.
My answer to the above would be a much shorter article than Roberts has penned:
I’ve no idea, largely on the basis that no-one knows whether an Apple iWatch actually exists, and hardly anyone’s had a go on Google Glass.
The thing is, that’s not the kind of article that gets eyeballs. What you instead need to do is fire up the speculation engine, and splatter its turd fuel all over the internet.
To his credit, Roberts does at least seem to have an inkling of how ridiculous his article is going to be, and says:
Sure, the battle is a little lopsided in that Google Glass is a real product, albeit still for developers only, while iWatch remains only speculation.
The end!
But no; instead, he continues:
But let’s assume that both will be real products soon enough and look at their individual strengths and weaknesses.
How about let’s not assume both will be real products soon enough. And let’s not look at their individual strengths and weaknesses, because no-one has any bloody idea what an iWatch’s might be, BECAUSE IT DOESN’T EXIST YET.
Face vs. Wrist
Facepalm vs. Chinese burn.
The wrist is an easy target, as it has been the home of technological advancements from the beginning of the wristwatch era, c. 1920 and peaking during the digital watch revolution in the 1970s. Many people are used to wearing technology on their wrists.
OH GOD I THINK MY BRAIN JUST MELTED AND I CAN’T TAKE ANY MORE.
*sterlingeffort*
Google Glass, however, doesn’t just shift the location of the phone screen: instead it offers a completely new computing paradigm.
BUZZWORD BINGO HOUSE!
And then, instead of comparing something that doesn’t exist with something that barely does, Roberts essentially writes the following:
Google Glass! SQUEEEE! I love Google Glass. Google Glass looks super-awesome. Google Glass is amazing! Have you noticed how much I like Google Glass, because I really like Google Glass? I’m not actually going to state whether I’ve used Google Glass yet, but, man, GOOGLE GLASS. It’s just… GOOGLE GLASS! GOOGLE! GLASS!
And people wonder why the vast majority of tech journalism is a train wreck.
Yes, but HOW DO THEY COMPARE???!